The narrator states that in terms of Chao-hua Liu’s cul- tural identity, late in his life Chao-hua Liu had become: States. 31 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE. ACT-Z14 3 3 Passage II SOCIAL SCIENCE: Passage A is adapted from the article “At Libraries, Quiet Makes a Comeback” by Jennifer Howard (©2012 by The Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.). Pas- sage B is adapted from the book The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction by Alan Jacobs (©2011 by Alan Jacobs). Passage A by Jennifer Howard The buzzing of smartphones, the clacking of com- puter keys, the chatter of study groups: Academic libraries aren’t the quiet temples to scholarship they used to be. Personal portable technology takes some of the blame. So does the current pedagogical emphasis on group work. In response to students’ devices and habits, many college libraries have installed coffee shops and embraced the learning-commons model of design, cre- ating wired spaces where groups can gather and plug in. Library quiet is making a comeback, though, in part because students themselves are asking for it. “Stu- dents crave quiet as much as they crave conversation,” says Karen G. Schneider, director for library services at Holy Names University. “A lot of libraries are zoning their space into areas where there can be quiet conversa- tion, absolute silence, and even livelier conversations.” The way librarians, students, and researchers behave undermines what Ms. Schneider calls “the stereotype of the shushing librarian and absolute pin- drop silence.” She and other librarians point out that students are often the first to bring up noise problems in the library, to ask for more quiet spaces, and to police those spaces themselves. “We assume this is the multitasking generation. It’s how they’ve been labeled,” says Alison J. Head, co- director of the University of Washington’s Project Information Literacy, which looks at how young adults do research. But her own research has shown that “these students do seek solitude, they do seek the quaint hush of the library and a place they can dial down.” Eric A. Kidwell, director of the library at Hunting- don College, cites “this prevailing attitude among fac- ulty and administrators that all students want to be in a group situation all the time.” That’s not the case, in his experience. “Maybe there’s more of that, but there are plenty of students out there who enjoy being by them- selves, or can’t study with their earphones in and the TV on.” The solution, in Mr. Kidwell’s view, is “to be as creative as we can in our space design to provide as many different types of reading and study space as we can.” The most popular room at his library is not a fully wired collaborative space but a small room that’s designed to look like an old-fashioned study. “We bought a small table, a rocking chair, a wingback chair,” he says. “We wish we had the ability to make more rooms like that.” Passage B by Alan Jacobs The noisier the environment, the more readers are driven to be silent. The boy trying to study at the kitchen table while the clamor of family life goes on around him is a typical figure in the history of reading. No one could plausibly claim that we late moderns are uniquely challenged in this respect: surely a higher per- centage of human beings today have regular access to silence than at any time in human history. Most Ameri- cans and Western Europeans, and many people else- where—not all, mind you—live in environments with quiet rooms, or quiet corners. And many who lack quiet homes have had access to libraries, which have for cen- turies been dedicated, as it were, to silence. That may be changing, though. Here’s an example from the United Kingdom that has analogues in several other countries. In 2008, when Andy Burnham was Gordon Brown’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, he announced that libraries had to change: “Libraries should be a place for families and joy and chatter. The word chatter might strike fear into the heart of traditionalists but libraries should be social places that offer an antidote to the isolation of someone play- ing on the internet at home.” Libraries need to “look beyond the bookcase,” which means, among other things, allowing the use of cellphones and selling (or at least allowing people to bring in) food and drink. Even among educated folk, these proposals got some support, largely out of fear that without some such change libraries will become irrelevant and unused, and eventually will disappear altogether. But others fumed. Victoria Coren wrote, “My brain is strug- gling with the philosophical question: if there is noth- ing inside but people eating burgers and playing computer games, is it actually a library? Isn’t it just an internet cafe?” To the “they must look beyond the bookcase” line, Coren retorted, “Why? Why must they? They’re libraries. The bookcase is exactly where they should be looking. Someone should be. I can eat and make phone calls at home.”