A student claimed that the acid in UAX is pyruvic acid. Based on Table 1 and Figure 1, this claim is incorrect because the pK, of pyruvic acid is: ? D. greater than was the pH at the halfway point. : : 7) 28. Suppose Experiment 3 is repeated, but the concentra- aA. oe Expermeuts 1 on’ * 3" ee a differ tion of the NaOH solution FS 0.200 mole/L. Will the volume of NaOH added at the halfway point and at the F, In Experiment 1, the analyte was stirred; in Exper- equivalence point be less than, greater Sen, or equal to iment 3, the analyte was not stirred. ; the corresponding results shown in Figure 3 ? ment 3, the titrant was not stirred. halfway point equivalence point the analyte in Experiment 3. G. greater less titrant in Experiment 3. J. equal equal Passage Vi 29. Which of the following terms best describes the mix- ture of iodine and solvent in cach of the beakers at the A teacher opr ame ae he a reac — —— end of the teacher’s demonstration? beaker contained mineral oil an other contai + as «ae Solid iodine was added to each beaker. The solid iodine lodine and mineral oil iodine and H1,0 quickly dissolved in the mineral oil, which turned pink. A. heterogeneous heterogeneous The solid stayed at the bottom of the H,O, which remained B. heterogencous homogeneous colorless. The teacher asked 3 students to explain these Cc, homogencous heterogeneous results. D. homogeneous homogeneous Student I Mineral oil is made up of very large molecules, while , « H,O is made up of very small molecules. Thus, the spaces 30. Based on Student 1’s explanation, is it likely that solid between mineral oil molecules are much larger than the H,0 would be soluble in mineral oil? spaces between H,O molecules (sce figure). F. Yes, because the solute molecules and the solvent molecules are yan than mineral oil molecules. solvent molecules are sem ge aA mineral oil molecules. smaller space between HO molecules larger space between mineral oil molecules 31. How would Student 1 most likely rank the 3 sub- stances used in the demonstration, from the substance For a solid to dissolve in a solvent, its molecules must with the smallest molecular mass to the substance with suerte in between solvent molecules. The molecular mass the largest molecular mass? (the mass of 1 molecule in atomic mass units, amu) of a A. Iodine < H,O < mineral oil - gubstance is a good indicator of molecular size, so if a B. H,O < iodine < mineral oil solid has a molecular mass less than that of a solvent, it C. Mineral oil < iodine < H,O : will most likely dissolve in the solvent. Therefore, the D. Mineral oil < HO < iodine iodine dissolved in the mineral oil, but not in the H-O Student 2 _An H,0 molecule is polar because it has a region of = 32, In Student 2’s explanation, the sentence “Therefore, positive charge and a region of negative charge. Nonpolar the iodine dissolved in the mineral oil, but not in the molecules, like those that make up mineral oil, do not have H,O” implied that iodine molecules are: differently charged regions. Polar molecules are attracted F ; to each other, and nonpolar molecules are attracted to each G catty = other, but pou molecules repel nonpolar molecules. Thus, aH Snail han H.O molecul polar solids dissolve in polar solvents, and nonpolar solids . : a Aaa 3 = sal cs. dissolve in nonpolar solvents. Therefore, the iodine dis- J. larger a MOLCCUICS. solved in the mineral oii, but not in the H,O. Molecular size is unrelated to solubility. Student 3 33. Suppose age cg ee = molecules Student 2 is correct, but with one exception. Nonpolar were smaller than iodine molecules. What impact, molecules are actually strongly attracted to polar mole- if any, a this observation have on Student 3's cules. The reason that nonpolar substances don’t dissolve explanation in polar substances is that polar molecules are too strongly A. It would prove that the explanation is correct. attracted to each other to allow nonpolar molecules to B. It would support the explanation, but not prove come between them. If a — of mineral oil is placed on that the explanation is correct. the surface of a pan full of H,O, the drop will spread to C. It would weaken the explanation, but not prove form the thinnest layer possible in order to maximize con- that the explanation is incorrect. tact with H,O molecules. D. It would have no impact on the explanation.