In the context of the passage, lines 58-61 priTnarily serve to.. compare the value of $120 today with the value of $120 in Clinton's time. contradict what Clinton had predicted would be the cost of operatino the Eric Canal. support the point that the Erie Canal was primarily a route to transpoit foodstuffs. illustrate why the Erie Canal was so heavily used. ACT.70C 33 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE. Passage111 55 which happened to be the first book to employ the Eng- lish word dictionary in its title. Twenty years later a man named Withals put out A Shorte Dicfionarie for Yonge Besiiiiiers in both languages, but with words arranged not alphabetically, but by subject, such as 'the 60 names of the Byrdes, Byrdes of the Water, Byrdes about the house, as cockes, hennes, etc., of Bees, Flies, and otheis. HUMANITIES: This passage is adapted from Th8 Prof8ssor and th8 Madman by Simon Winchester ((>1998 by Simon Winchester). The 'English dictionary, in the sense that we commonly use the phrase today, is a relatively new invention. Four hundred years ago there was no such convenience available on any English bookshelf. But what was still lacking was a proper English dictionary, a full statement of the extent of the English 65 tongue. With one single exception, of which Shakespeare probably did not know when he died in 1616, this need remained stubbornly unfulfilled. Others were to remark on the apparent lack as well. In the very same year as Shakespeare's death, his friend John 70 Webster wrote his play The Duchess of Malfi, incorpo- rating a scene in which the duchess's brother Ferdinand imagine% that he is turning into a wolf, 'a pestilent dis- 'What is that??? cries one ease they call licanthropia. of the cast. 'I need a dictionary to*t!?? There was none available, for instance, when William Shakespeare was writing his plays. Whenever he came to use an unusual word, or to set a word in what seemed an unusual context-and his plays are extraordinarily rich with examples-he had almost no 10 way of checking the propriety of what he was about to do. He could not, as the saying goes, "Inok .qomething up., Indeed, the very phrase-when it is used in the sense of 'searching for something in a dictionary or encyclopedia or other book of reference" simply did 15 not exist. It doeg not appear in the English languaoe, in fact, unlil as late as 1692, when an Oxford historian named Anthony Wood used it. 75 But in fact someone. a Rutland schoolmaster named Robert Cawdrey, who later moved to teach in Coventry, had evidently been listening to this drumbeat of demand. He read and took copious notes from all the reference books of the day and eventually produced his 80 first halfhearted attempt at what was wanted by pub- lishin(T such a list in 1604. It was a small octavo book of 120 pages, wbich Cawdrey titled A Table Alphabeti- call of hard unusual English word.s. It had about 2,500 word entries. It had many shortcomings; but it 85 was without doubt .the very first true monolin(Fual Eng- lish dictionary, and its publication remains a pivotal moment in the history of English lexicography. One might think Shakespeare would want to look things up all the time. "Am not I consanguineous?" he 20 writes in Twelf£h Nighi. A few lines on he talks of "thy doublet of changeable taffeta., He then declares: "Now is the woodcock near the gin,, Sbakespearc's vocabu- lary was evidently prodioious: But how could he be certain that in all the case8 where he employed unfamil- 25 iar words, he was grammatically and factually right? At the time he was writing ihere were atlases aplenty, there were prayer books, missals, histories, biographies, romances, and books of science and art. Shakespeare is thought to have drawn tnany of his clas- 30 sical allusions from a specialized Tliesaurus that had been compiled by a man named Thomas Cooper-its many errors are replicated far too exactly in the plays for it to be coincidence-and he is thought al,so to have drawn from Thomas Wilson's Arte of Rhelorique. It is 35 perhaps difficult to imagine so creative a mind working without a single work of lexicographical reference beside him, other than Mr. Cooper's crib (which Mrs. Cooper once threw into the fire, prompting the great man to begin all over again) and Mr. Wilson's little 40 manual, but that was the condition under which his par- ticular genius was compelled to flourish. The English language was spoken and written-but at the time of Shakespeare it was not defined, not fixed. It was like the air it was taken for granted, the medium that 45 enveloped and defined all Britons. But as to exactly what it was, what its components were-who knew?
