In Study 2, if & soil satnple had shown Vlrtu8lly no deci'tase in weight dllrin8 the healing process, the sci- entisl conducling the sivdy would most likcly have concluded which of the following? than 2 mrn in diameter. than 0.06 rjirn in diameter. proces5 remov¢d 6ignifi¢ant amouDts of waler. The lieating process re0Ve.]Itu¢ QT Waler. Study I Adry,500. sample of a %oil (Soil l) wab ivashcd througb 2 screen with 0.06 nirn holes to iemove all of the sili alljd c12y particles. The soil remaining oil the screeD was dried and w.eighed, then sified through a sefieq of screens, each successive Screen liaving smaller bole$ Ihan the onc before, to separate the particles in diffcreKIt cate- gorjes. The portic)es of each category were theD IN:ei8bed, and the procedure Mias repeated foi. saniples of 4 otlier 80ils (Soils 2-5). The resulLq are shown in Table 2.
