While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:
●The linguistic relativity hypothesis, also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, suggests that the structure of a language influences how its speakers perceive and think about the world.
●1929: Linguist Edward Sapir proposed that language shapes human thought, but he did not claim that language strictly determines cognition.
●1956: Linguist Benjamin Lee Whorf expanded on Sapir's ideas, arguing for a stronger version of the hypothesis---suggesting that differences in language create fundamental differences in perception. ●Modern research largely supports a weaker version of the hypothesis, acknowledging that language influences thought but does not entirely determine it.
The student wants to compare Sapir's original hypothesis with Whorf's later expansion. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?